The French Academic Journal of Primary Care (FAJPC) primarily publishes original scientific articles in the fields of primary care (family medicine, clinical pharmacy, nursing, physical therapy, midwifery, dentistry, etc.).
Manuscripts must comply with the journal’s ethical charter and the formatting recommendations, as outlined in these author guidelines.
Submissions should be made through the journal online manuscript submission platform. Upon submission, authors will receive an automatic acknowledgment of receipt. For inquiries not addressed through the submission platform, the editorial office may be contacted at FAJPC@cnge.fr if needed. The journal appreciates the author’s interests in publishing with FAJPC and is committed to respecting the ethical charter and supporting authors in the dissemination of high-quality scientific work within a constructive and supportive publishing environment.
Publication Policy
Manuscripts submitted to FAJPC must comply with the rules of the International Committee for Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE): http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. The French version is available for download: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/translations/french2017.pdf. In particular, all authors must have approved the final version of the manuscript at the time of submission. The cover letter accompanying the manuscript must indicate whether the work has been previously published, submitted elsewhere, or accepted for publication in another journal. In such cases, authors must obtain written permission from the original journal and provide this documentation to FAJPC along with the manuscript at the time of submission.
Research work must comply with the ethical recommendations of the Declaration of Helsinki ("WMA Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects"). It must comply with an appropriate Research Ethics Committee (REC), Institutional Review Board (IRB), Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC), or, in France, a “Comité de Protection des Personnes” (CPP), in accordance with applicable national regulations. In France, this requirement applies to studies classified under the Jardé Law, and to research involving the use of individual health data. The article by Astruc et al., published in issue 172 of the journal exercer, facilitates understanding of the Jardé Law. The article by Jouannin et al. provides a didactic tool for the Jardé Law of November 17, 2016, in issue 155 of exercer. Other research involving the use of individual data must have been approved by an ethics committee. Research must also comply with data protection legislation, in accordance with the French Data Protection Authority (CNIL), where relevant. Details of ethical approval and data protection authorization must be reported in both the cover letter and the "Methods" section of the manuscript.
Authors are required to comply with international standards regarding the disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. The ICMJE provides a standardized disclosure form for reporting potential conflicts of interest. FAJPC provides a French translation of this form, but the official version remains the English-language version (the ICMJE has not certified the French version). The corresponding author must obtain the completed forms from each co-author, retain them, and provide them to the journal upon request. All authors must include any relationships, activities or interests that could be perceived as influencing the submitted work. A conflict-of-interest statement must be included at the beginning of the manuscript. Additionally, FAJPC includes the following statement at the beginning of each published article: "The potential conflicts of interest of each of the authors of this article are available on the website: www.transparence.sante.gouv.fr"
Any sources of funding for the submitted work must also be declared in the cover letter and at the end of the article.
The intellectual property of the articles belongs to the authors, who grant FAJPC (and the Episcience platform) a non-exclusive right to publish in their name. Commercial use of the article is prohibited. Information regarding copyright is available on the journal’s website: https://fajpc.episciences.org.
The cover letter should briefly describe the submitted work and its relevance to the journal’s readership. It should include any information relevant to the ethical approval of the study by competent authorities or institutions, including but not limited to ethics committees; and any sources of funding. The corresponding author is responsible for collecting conflict-of-interest declarations from all co-authors and must include the following statement: "All authors have declared on the ICMJE form all their links or potential conflicts of interest (financial activities, connections with companies or institutions) related to the current study."
The entire text must be typed using a word processing software and submitted in Microsoft Word® format (.doc or .docx). Use Arial font, size 10, 1.5 line spacing, justified paragraphs, no indentation, and no numbering. Section titles and subheadings must be in bold, lowercase, and not underlined. Italics should be used for Latin words, foreign terms, and the p-value (if applicable).
Units of Measurement
Typographical and Style
When presenting test results:
Examples**:**
All punctuation marks must be followed by a space. Commas and periods must be attached to the preceding word. Compound punctuation marks must be preceded by a non-breaking space (Ctrl + Shift + Space in Windows®).
Exceptions**:**
Separate Title Page : this document must include:
Authors may acknowledge individuals who have significantly contributed to the study or manuscript. These acknowledgments should appear at the end of the article, following the funding statement and before the references. The corresponding author must obtain written consent from the acknowledged individuals prior to submission, who thereby approve the research conditions and the article’s conclusions.
Manuscript Structure
First Page
The recommended article length is a maximum of 30 000 characters (including spaces), references included. The style should be simple and precise. "The absence of style is the best style in medical writing." Sentences should be short (220 characters maximum, or approximately 35 words).
References
References must follow the Vancouver style and be numbered in superscript in order in which they are first cited in the text. Reference numbers should be placed at the end of sentences, before the punctuation mark. The same reference used multiple times retains the same number.
Journal Articles
Cite the first six authors with their initials followed by a comma, and the last author followed by a full stop. For more than six authors, cite the first three followed by "et al." Then, include the full title of the article in its original language, followed by a period, the journal name (abbreviated according to Index Medicus, without a period; if the journal is not listed in Index Medicus, write its full title with all the words capitalized), the publication year followed by a semicolon (no space), the issue number in the volume, followed by the volume number (if available) in parentheses, followed by a colon (no space), then the first page number in full and the last page number abbreviated (without repeating tens or hundreds if identical), separated by a hyphen. The reference must always end with a full stop.
Examples**:**
For systematic reviews or meta-analyses from the Cochrane Database, the Cochrane reference number must appear at the end of the reference.
Books and Book Chapters
References for books or book chapters must include the authors’ names, book title, edition number, city, publisher, and publication year, following the two examples below:
Online Documents
References for online documents must include the authors’ names, document title, website URL (preceded by "Available from:"), and the date of access in square brackets.
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements
References for clinical practice guidelines, framework documents, or consensus statements must include the name of the issuing agency, guideline title, publisher’s city, and publication year.
Legal References
References to laws or legal texts must include the law or code article number and, if applicable, its title.
Note: Unpublished theses are not validated scientific references by the community.
Manuscripts that do not comply with these minimum recommendations will be returned to the authors prior to editorial assessment.
This section presents an original scientific work (qualitative, quantitative, or interventional) conducted in the field of primary healthcare. The maximum recommended length is 30 000 characters (including spaces), or approximately 5000 words, including abstracts, tables, and references. The number of bibliographic references must not exceed 25, except for literature reviews. Abstracts must be structured into 5 paragraphs: background, objective(s), methods, results, conclusion.
The article must follow the IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, And Discussion).
| INTRODUCTION | State of knowledge and problematization. The introduction must describe the context, include previous references related to the topic, present the problem or gaps in the field, and state the primary and secondary objectives (written in the past tense) at the end. |
| METHODS | (How the team addressed the research question) This section must include: - The study population; - Data collection; - Data analysis; - Judgment criteria; - Statistical tests; - Software used; - Research authorizations obtained, with their registration numbers. The Methods and Results sections should generally be written in the past tense (sometimes imperfect), never in the present indicative, future, or conditional. In the Discussion section, verb tenses are flexible, typically alternating between the present and past tense, depending on whether the text refers to the current study’s results or cited references. The passive voice should be favored, and the first person or "we" should only be used to convey genuinely subjective considerations. Numerical data consistency between the text and tables must be meticulously checked. It is unnecessary to present all numerical data in both the Results text and tables. |
| RESULTS | Results should be as detailed as possible. Statistical analysis results must be reported in the text or tables, including p-values or confidence intervals. For qualitative research articles, exemplary verbatim must be included in the body of the text, in quotation marks and italics. |
| DISCUSSION | The discussion should begin with an analysis of the main results, followed by a comparison with existing literature. The strengths and limitations of the study must be presented in a separate section. The final paragraph should outline perspectives. |
| CONCLUSION | A conclusion is not mandatory. The work may end with the perspectives. If the authors choose to include a conclusion, it should be short and integrative. |
Specific Recommendations for Original Articles
All these checklists are available on the EQUATOR Network website.
Editorials may be submitted spontaneously by authors or commissioned by the Editorial Board. The author or group of authors presents a theme or opinion, explaining their position on a free or assigned topic. Editorials may highlight a current issue or an article in the journal. They may also foster or scientifically contribute to a controversy or professional debate. Topics maybe medical or related to developments of the healthcare system, healthcare organization, or medical practice.
Editorials are brief (4000 characters including spaces, exceptionally 8000) with fewer than 5 references.
Submitted articles are first reviewed by the Editorial Board before being sent for peer review, ensuring author anonymity. Reviewers are required to adhere to following FAJPC’s ethical recommendations. Peer reviewers use an article-specific evaluation form and provide recommendations regarding to the manuscript. Reviewer reports are anonymized and shared with authors help them modify their text according to the provided feedback. The reviewer guidelines are available on the FAJPC website. Authors are encouraged to consult them as well.
Detailed Submission and Evaluation Process
The submission and evaluation process is as follows:
Peer review: Manuscripts that successful pass these initial steps are reviewed by two or three independent blind reviewers for peer review. Reviewers assess the originality, relevance, and scientific quality using specific evaluation forms. The three evaluations are then synthesized by the Editorial Board.
Editorial Decisions: One of the following decisions may be issued:
The final publication decision is made by the Editorial Board.
The peer-review process is based on a mix of factual data and subjective opinions, which do not always lead to the correct decision. Authors may appeal a rejection decision if they believe that the reviewers or Editorial Board have misunderstood important aspects of the manuscript or that substantial factual errors have influenced the decision. To do so, they must respond point-by-point in writing to all scientific criticisms, propose a revised version of their article addressing all comments and clarifying all discussion points. This letter is examined and commented on by the article’s reviewers, and the final decision rests with the editorial team. If justified, the editorial team may decide to send the new version of the article to three additional reviewers.
Last updated: July 5, 2026